Category: Uncategorized
-
THIS AGREEMENT made at ……………………. on this ……………. day of ………………., 2000, between A, son of …………………. resident of …………………. (hereinafter called the vendor) of the FIRST PART, B, son of………………….. resident of …………………………… (hereinafter called the purchaser) of the SECOND PART and C son of ………………… resident of………………………………… (hereinafter called the mortgagee) of the…
-
THIS AGREEMENT is made at ____ this ________ day of ______ between Mr. A residing at __________ hereinafter referred to as the Vendor of the One Part and Mr. B residing at _____________________ hereinafter referred to as the Purchaser of the Other part. WHEREAS 1. By a Deed of Lease Dated the _________ day of…
-
THIS AGREEMENT FOR SALE made at ___________this ________ day of ___________ in the Christian Year Two Thousand _______ BETWEEN ABC of ____________, Indian Inhabitant, having address at _____________________________________________________________, hereinafter called “THE VENDOR” (Which expression shall unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof be deemed to include his heirs, executors and administrators) of the…
-
THIS AGREEMENT Is made at … this … day of… between Mr. A carrying on business at … hereinafter referred to as the ‘Seller’ of the One Part and M/s A B & Co. Ltd., a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having Its registered office at… hereinafter referred to as the ‘Company’…
-
THIS AGREEMENT is made at … this … day of… between A B & Co. Ltd., a company registered under the (Indian) Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at … hereinafter referred to as ‘the Seller’ of the One Part and M/s … a foreign company registered under the … Companies Act and…
-
THIS AGREEMENT is made at … this … day of … between M/s. A B & Co. Ltd., a company registered under the (English) Companies Act and having Its registered Office at … London. hereinafter referred to as the ‘Seller’ of the one part and M/s. X Y & Co. Ltd., a Company registered under…
-
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a person’s fundamental rights cannot be taken away for non-payment of a loan. The court quashed a look-out circular (LOC) issued against a man who defaulted on loans for two cars. The court stated that the petitioner’s appearance in court nullified the earlier order declaring him a proclaimed…
-
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to a businessman who was arrested with 1.01kg of charas, after the weight of the seized contraband measured before a magistrate two months later was found to be 10 grams less. The court considered the weight measured before the magistrate as part of procedural compliance and concluded that…
-
Justice M S Karnik granted bail to an accused in a drug case, considering the weight of the seized contraband as an intermediate quantity, not commercial. The accused, Nayak, had been caught with 1kg of charas, which falls under the category of cannabis in the NDPS Act. The high court clarified that it expressed no…
-
Liking ‘obscene’ content on social media no crime, sharing is: Allahabad high court | Allahabad News
PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad High Court recently said that liking an “obscene” post on social media does not constitute an offense. However, the act of sharing or reposting such content will lead to legal consequences. The court, in its ruling on Wednesday, explained that sharing such a post falls under the category of “transmission” as per…