Category: Uncategorized
-
IN THE SESSIONS COURT OF Criminal Miscellaneous (Bail) Application No of 20 Applicant: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged , residing in The deponent named above hereby solemnly and affirms as follows:— 1. That I am the deponent referred to above and the accused in Sessions Case No , which is allegedly for…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is well…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is…
-
IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, In Criminal Complaint No of 20 Petitioners Vs. Respondent AFFIDAVIT of , D/o , aged years, presently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as follows:— That the deponent is petitioner No. 1 in the matter referred to above. The deponent is fully conversant with the…
-
BEFORE THE HON’BLE ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, C.M.A. No of 20 In Divorce OP. No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT of , W/o , D/o , aged , now residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and states as follows:— 1. That the deponent is the petitioner in the accompanying petition and is well…
-
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT, Transfer original petition No of 20 In Original Suit No of 20 BEFORE THE COURT OF Petitioner/Defendant: Vs. Respondent/Plaintiff: AFFIDAVIT of, , S/o , aged years, now residing in The deponent named above hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— 1. That the deponent is the petitioner in the Transfer…
-
The Karnataka High Court has suggested that access to social media should be restricted for youngsters, especially schoolchildren, and proposed that the age threshold for access should be 21 or 18 years, when they gain the right to vote. The court stated that school-going children are becoming addicted to social media, and it would be…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is well…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is well…
-
Wilful denial of sex by a spouse amounts to cruelty, Delhi High Court has said, upholding divorce for a couple whose marriage had lasted barely 35 days and failed on account of non-consummation of marriage by the wife. #Denial #sex #spouse #amounts #cruelty #Delhi