In the Court of District Judge . ………… Application No . ………………..of ……………….. In Suit No …………… ………………..of ……………….. Smt. A …………………………………………. Applicant/Petitioner Vs Shri B………………………………………………….…… Opposite Party/Respondent I, Smt. A, aged about ………………..years, wife of Shri …………………………………………………..resident of ………………………………………………………………………………….. do solemnly affirm and state as follows: 1 That I am the petitioner in the…
BEFORE THE SUB-REGISTRAR, In the matter of registration of the WILL executed by Shri ……………………. son of …….resident of……………………………….. AFFIDAVIT of ……., S/o…………………….. , aged about years, residing in and , S/o , aged about years, residing in ……………………………. We, the abovenamed deponents, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as under: 1.That we, the deponents,…
In the Court of Addl. District Judge IV . ………… Petition No . of Shri A Petitioner/Opposite Party vs Smt. B Respondent/Applicant Affidavit of Smt. B aged about ………………..years, wife of Shri A, resident of …………………………………………………………………… I, Smt. B, aged about ………………..years, wife of Shri …………………………………………………………………………………………. resident of ………………………………………………………………………………………….. do hereby solemnly affirm and state…
BEFORE THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ________________________________ Affidavit of Mr. ……………………, aged ________________ __ years S/o ____________________ Resi ____________________ I, the above name deponent solemnly affirm and state on oath as under: 1. That the deponent has applied before your Honour for the resumption of Indian Citizenship, and hence is fully conversant of the facts deposed below.…
BEFORE THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, _______________ Affidavit of Mr. A aged about ____ S/o Mr.___________, resident of __________________________. I, the above named deponent solemnly affirm and state as under in the case for the Assessment Year ________. 1. That the deponent is the proprietor of the firm named _________________________ and hence is fully conversant of the…
BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT OF………………….. Affidavit In Anticipatory Bail Application No. ………………… of ……. (Under Section 438, Cr.P.C.) District……………………………………………………………………. Sri. ………………………………………………. S/o………………………………………………. R/o………………………………………..…….. P. S. ……………………………………………… District …………………………… .. …Applicant Versus Affidavit of Sri. …………………………………….. aged about .……….. S/o ……………………………………………………….. R/o …………………………………………………….… P.S………………………………………….….………… District ………………………………………………….. …Deponent I, the deponent above named do hereby solemnly affirm…
Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker, said that cases related to the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi title suit have been withdrawn from a single-judge bench of the Allahabad high court. Diwaker stated that the judge was hearing the matter without jurisdiction, which he deemed as a case of “judicial impropriety.” #Allahabad #judge #heard #Gyanvapi #case #2yrs #sans #jurisdiction
Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker, said that cases related to the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi title suit have been withdrawn from a single-judge bench of the Allahabad high court. Diwaker stated that the judge was hearing the matter without jurisdiction, which he deemed as a case of “judicial impropriety.” #Allahabad #judge #heard #Gyanvapi #case #2yrs #sans #jurisdiction
TDP president Nara Chandrababu Naidu has approached the Andhra Pradesh high court to dismiss the FIR against him in the alleged skill development scam case. He argues that the case was politically motivated and there is no evidence to support the allegations. #Quash #FIR #case #filed #mala #fide #intent #Chandrababu #Naidu
TDP president Nara Chandrababu Naidu has approached the Andhra Pradesh high court to dismiss the FIR against him in the alleged skill development scam case. He argues that the case was politically motivated and there is no evidence to support the allegations. #Quash #FIR #case #filed #mala #fide #intent #Chandrababu #Naidu