Author: admin
-
The Karnataka High Court has suggested that access to social media should be restricted for youngsters, especially schoolchildren, and proposed that the age threshold for access should be 21 or 18 years, when they gain the right to vote. The court stated that school-going children are becoming addicted to social media, and it would be…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is well…
-
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, Criminal Complaint No of 20 Complainant: Vs. Accused: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently and permanently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— That the deponent herein is the Complainant in the Criminal Complaint referred to above. The deponent is well…
-
Wilful denial of sex by a spouse amounts to cruelty, Delhi High Court has said, upholding divorce for a couple whose marriage had lasted barely 35 days and failed on account of non-consummation of marriage by the wife. #Denial #sex #spouse #amounts #cruelty #Delhi
-
BEFORE THE HON’BLE ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, C.M.A. No of 20 In Divorce OP. No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT of , W/o , D/o , aged , now residing in The deponent above named hereby solemnly affirms and states as follows:— 1. That the deponent is the petitioner in the accompanying petition and is…
-
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT, Transfer original petition No of 20 In Original Suit No of 20 BEFORE THE COURT OF Petitioner/Defendant: Vs. Respondent/Plaintiff: AFFIDAVIT of, , S/o , aged years, now residing in The deponent named above hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— 1. That the deponent is the petitioner in the Transfer…
-
IN THE COURT OF ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, H.M.A. Petition No of 20 Petitioner No. 1: Vs. Petitioner No. 2: AFFIDAVIT of , W/o , D/o , aged years, presently residing in The deponent abovenamed solemnly affirms and states as under:— That the deponent is petitioner No. 1 in the accompanying petition and is well conversant…
-
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, H.M.A Petition No of 20 Petitioner No. 1 Vs. Petitioner No. 2 AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged years, presently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and states as follows:— That the deponent is petitioner No. 2 in the petition referred to above. Being well…
-
The Supreme Court has refused to provide relief to Jharkhand chief minister Hemant Soren in a money laundering case. The court directed Soren to approach the concerned high court with his plea. Soren had argued that the ED case against him was an abuse of law by the Central Government and a misuse of central…
-
The Madras High Court has stated that free speech cannot be considered hate speech and that untouchability is unconstitutional, both within and outside of the Sanatan Dharma. This came as the court heard a petition against a Tamil Nadu college that had sought students’ views on the topic of “Opposition to Sanatan.” #Free #speech #hate…