IN THE COURT OF ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, H.M.A. Petition No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondents: AFFIDAVIT of , W/o , D/o , aged years, now residing in The deponent abovenamed solemnly affirms and states as follows:— That the deponent is the petitioner in the accompanying petition and being well conversant with the facts and circumstances…
Justice Bharati Dangre of the Bombay High Court recused herself from hearing a plea in an economic offence case and cited a letter delivered to her residence as the reason. The letter, sent by Hiten Thakkar, alleged that another judge had improperly recused themselves from the same plea. Justice Dangre referred to this as a…
Justice Bharati Dangre of the Bombay High Court recused herself from hearing a plea in an economic offence case and cited a letter delivered to her residence as the reason. The letter, sent by Hiten Thakkar, alleged that another judge had improperly recused themselves from the same plea. Justice Dangre referred to this as a…
CHENNAI: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Chennai bench on Wednesday ordered that a Rs 19,000-crore share buyback undertaken by technology major Cognizant in 2017-18 attracts dividend distribution tax of Rs 4,853 crore. The ITAT‘s ruling dismissed an appeal filed by Cognizant. Cognizant conducted a share buyback through a scheme approved by the Madras high…
IN THE COURT OF ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, H.M.A. Petition No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT I, , W/o , D/o , presently residing in , do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as follows:— That, I am the petitioner in the accompanying petition and I am well conversant with the facts and circumstances of the…
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, H.M.A. Petition No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged , presently residing in The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and states as follows:— That, the deponent is the petitioner in the accompanying petition and is well conversant with the facts and circumstances…
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT, Affidavit in Divorce O.P. No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Respondent: AFFIDAVIT I, ,W/o , D/o , aged years, now residing in , do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows:— 1. I say that, I am the deponent abovenamed and I am well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of…
BEFORE THE HON’BLE CIVIL COURT Interlocutory Application No of 20 In Original Suit No of 20 Petitioner: Vs. Counter Petitioner: AFFIDAVIT of , S/o , aged , residing at …………………………. The deponent abovenamed hereby solemnly affirms and declares as under:— 1. The deponent is the Managing Partner and authorised signatory of the petitioner in the…
As per Order xxxvii Rule 3 (6) (b) if the defendant is permitted to defend as to the whole or any part of the claim, the Court or Judge may direct him to give such security and within such time as may be fixed by the Court or Judge and that, on failure to give…
FORM NO. I PART – I 1. We, (1) ____________________________________________________, (2) ______________________ (3) __________________________________ AND (4) ___________________, all of ___________, Indian inhabitants, do jointly and severally solemnly affirm and declare as under:— (i) That we are the Owners of property more particularly described in the Schedule hereunder written and which said property we have conveyed…